HCBBS Forum (Español)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

[". La seanaa de transición entre el cuerpo de lao y el anillo de lao no tiene espesores consistentes

2018-03-21View Original

Thread Content

"22. �ltim diseñé un equipo de torre, y he encontrado un problema. La se transición entre el anillo de transición y el cuerpo de lao utiliza placas de 1113MnNiMoR con un espesor mínimo de 3mm, y el cuerpo de anillo de 1 16mm. Los espesores no son consistentes. Sin embargo, en SW6, no se permitido calcular los espesores por separado. Si todos seen 1 1 1 1 1 16mm,,, no se si la seación de sección se se apropiado. ¿Cómo debería mane calculado este caso?
Reply #22018-03-21
" " " Sin no se necesario usar los mismosos espesores, pero la altura del anillo de tan alta que no se permitido econ costos.
Reply #32018-03-21
" " " Consider consider en cuenta la relación costo- beneficio se basado en satisfacer los cálculos de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de de fuerza y las normas reguladoras, se posible optimizar el diseño.. Sin no se satisfaci los cálculos de de de de de fuer , ¿cómo se hablar de cost de?
Reply #42018-03-21
?
Reply #52018-03-21
" " " Puede hacer lo sig lo sigue: use el espesor del anillo use 3mm,, y en la posición de de de de de corrosión del cuerpo de anillo se 1 1 en la posición del corrosión de del anillo de de trans 1C" y cálculo los cálculos..
Reply #62018-03-21
" " " ¿No no he segur decómo se esto se " " 1Mn n " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " kuk
Reply #72018-03-21
谢谢,主要是甲方要求过渡段与本体一致
Reply #82018-03-21
16太薄了, 这个塔价值应该比较高, 最后就靠裙座Q345R薄点挣钱很可笑吧。加厚到24以上吧,然后看看过渡段能不能薄几个
Reply #92018-03-21
不一定非要把Q345R的16mm加到30mm, 试算一下18、20、、、,连接面通过计算就可以
Reply #102018-03-22
裙座和过渡段可以取不同的腐蚀余量
Reply #112018-03-22
你是设计人,不合理甚至不可行的设计硬要做不脸红吗?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.