HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Chromomolybdenum steel and 321 stainless steel

2017-01-22View Original

Thread Content

Which is more heat and wear-resistant, chromium-molybdenum steel valves or 321 valves, and which is suitable for use in catalytic desulfurization lines and slurry systems?
Reply #22017-01-23
Chromomolybdenum steel is an umbrella term that is not precise; generally speaking, it offers better cost-performance for applications requiring heat and wear resistance.
Reply #32017-01-23
Chromomolybdenum steel comes in many varieties; I’m not sure which one the original poster is referring to
Reply #42017-01-23
As for chromium-molybdenum steel used in catalysis and coking, it is not as heat-resistant as 321. The wear resistance of valves depends mainly on the treatment of the sealing surfaces; methods such as surfacing with cemented carbide are used, but the core of the valve itself does not have good corrosion resistance

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.