HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Problems with AC pumps and variable-frequency pumps

2017-11-14View Original

Thread Content

Are the pumps in that device suitable for being replaced with variable-frequency pumps? Those pumps are suitable for power-frequency pumps. Are variable-frequency pumps more energy-efficient than fixed-frequency pumps? I hope to receive guidance from all the teachers. Thank you!
Reply #22017-11-15
Variable frequency definitely uses less power compared to fixed frequency; it also reduces the noise generated by motors on site. The principle of application is generally that it is more commonly used in low-voltage systems, while its use in high-voltage systems is relatively limited due to the higher cost of inverters
Reply #32017-11-15
The inrush current of certain large pumps when started directly causes too much strain on the power grid, so frequency conversion is also required. Variable frequency drives help save electricity, but the initial investment and subsequent maintenance costs are also high. Weigh it out.
Reply #42017-11-20
Higher initial investment and greater precision are required, but subsequent maintenance costs are lower.
Reply #52017-11-20
Is the investment for a power-frequency pump much higher than that for a frequency-changing pump? (Since it can save electricity, most of our devices use power-frequency pumps.)
Reply #62017-11-20
Aren’t all companies these days advocating for energy conservation and reduced consumption? What kind of maintenance is required in the future?
Reply #72017-11-20
Teacher, why can’t I give you a score as a way to thank you?
Reply #82017-11-20
Sure, the investment is substantial – for inverters, if you’re carrying out retrofits, factors such as the location where the inverters will be installed come into play
Reply #92017-11-20
Advocating energy conservation and emission reduction is not the same as making it a top priority. Leaders hope to achieve energy savings and reduced consumption through process methods or inexpensive equipment wherever possible. Regarding adding variable frequency technology, first of all, the remaining electricity cost might take several years or even a decade or so to cover the expense of installing such technology. Secondly, up-conversion will increase the budget; the annual budget for renovation projects is fixed, so it must be allocated first to more important process changes. So generally speaking, due to concerns about impacting the power grid, frequency upconversion requests are usually not approved by the authorities. Note: Up-converting the frequency of a large pump definitely results in greater energy savings compared to a small pump, but large pumps generally already have their frequency up-converted. So with a small pump and variable frequency drive, it might actually take over a decade to recoup the cost of the variable frequency drive.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.