HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What issues should be considered when using pre-filter bag dust collectors or electrostatic precipitators for the desulfurization of flue gas from catalytic cracking units?

2021-09-03View Original

Thread Content

What issues should be considered when using pre-filter bag dust collectors or electrostatic precipitators for the desulfurization of flue gas from catalytic cracking units?
Reply #22021-09-15
Electrostatic dust removal poses a risk of explosion. Try not to use it; if you must, safety interlocks are very important. A survey report from around the year 2000 stated that out of 40, 12 were blown up. Bag filters are very good. Filter materials are very important; it is necessary to choose an experienced technical provider. Several points to note: 1. The flow field should be uniform; there should be no undercooled zones ; 2. Flue gas temperature should not be too high nor too low. It would be ideal to couple it with a feedwater preheater or GGH, so that the flue gas temperature can be adjusted (this is just my guess; it may not make any sense).

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.