HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Check Violations by Looking at Pictures (October 23, 2018, Issue 6 of October)

2018-10-23View Original

Thread Content

Identify Violations by Looking at Images (October 23, 2018, Issue 6 of October). Notes: 1. There are many violations at construction sites or production sites, which hinder stable and safe production; we hope everyone will point out the issues shown in the images to help them improve their work. Thank you for your participation and support! ! ! Photos of on-site welding: Reference answers: 1. The workers were not wearing protective glasses. 2. Using the scaffold’s steps as a foothold is risky. 3. The scaffold did not have planks covering all areas. 4. The chin strap of the safety helmet was not fastened. 5. The height of the scaffold was inappropriate
Reply #22018-10-23
Safety helmets were not worn properly, and protective glasses were not used
Reply #32018-10-23
1. The welder did not wear a protective mask during the operation. 2. A safety belt was not used for working at heights. 3. The angle grinder lacked a protective cover
Reply #42018-10-23
1. No guardrails; 2. Protective masks.
Reply #52018-10-23
1. The workers were not wearing complete personal protective equipment; they had no goggles or dust masks; 2. Failure to wear a safety belt during work at heights ; 3. Pedals not fully installed ; 4. The pedal is not secured ; 5. The scaffold should be equipped with diagonal bracing ; 6. Miscellaneous items are placed on the pedals, with no measures in place to prevent them from falling ; 7. There is no supervisor at the work site.
Reply #62018-10-23
No goggles were worn, and the welding torch was not hung up
Reply #72018-10-23
There were no safety barriers in place at the site, and the area was dirty and messy
Reply #82018-10-23
1. The welder did not wear a protective mask during the operation. 2. A safety belt was not used for working at heights. 3. The angle grinder lacked a protective cover. 4. There were no guardrails in place

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.