Thread Content
For the safety meeting sessions that are held weekly in the laboratory, what do everyone do? It’s easy to repeat; is once a week too frequent?
Is there any real meaning to doing so many tests in the laboratory?
Let’s see how many beakers are missing, and think about under what circumstances they might have gone missing: lol, if there’s no shortage, then there’s no need to open them; P
Don’t underestimate the tests – have you mastered them fully? There are many tests involving exposure to hazardous materials; learn the precautions one by one*
The company plans safety activities, but there’s no way to do it
This is managed by the laboratory and isn’t closely linked to safety activities
Agreed, but everyone’s enthusiasm for learning* isn’t high
If there is a low level of enthusiasm for learning*, it’s definitely a matter of compensation. It’s not right to make people stay after work to study*, without giving them overtime pay or a salary. Making people take *exams and fining them if they don’t do well – that’s not right.
That’s just the corporate culture; we can only do our best in our work. Since there’s no way to change it, the best thing to do is to perform at our best
Oh, then be more meticulous during the training so that people can gain something from it – the time invested will be worth it. Testing involves coming into contact with all the chemicals present in the device, and that’s a significant amount. Are you confident about the details regarding each of these chemicals? Laboratory testing equipment is also a significant factor; it matters whether one has mastery at the level of \"three understandings and four skills\" or even beyond that. And then there’s safety, mainly personal protection