Thread Content
Note: Due to my limited knowledge, the views presented below may have many shortcomings; I kindly ask for your understanding and guidance. Regarding the component analysis of alkylated waste acid: The alkylation reaction requires an acid concentration of over 88.5%; when this concentration drops, the waste acid is discharged from the acid sedimentation tank in the reaction system into the waste acid tank. The typical composition of the waste sulfuric acid from alkylation units is as follows: 88.5–90.0% titratable acid, 3–5% organic hydrocarbons, 1.5–2% liquefied gas, 1.0–1.5% water, 0.5–1.0% organic sulfates, along with small amounts of sulfonic acids and other components ; The organic hydrocarbons in question are primarily isooctane components; these useful components have not been effectively recovered to date, which represents a significant flaw in the facility and results in substantial economic losses. For an alkylation plant with a capacity of 200,000 tons, the annual loss due to waste acid carrying along liquefied gas and isooctane amounts to around 3 million in terms of economic value. Scientific and reasonable methods for recovery should be given priority by enterprises. The isooctane entrained in the waste acid is not constant; as it moves through the discharge system of the waste acid treatment plant, its composition continues to change, which hinders the stable operation of the waste acid cracking unit and increases its energy consumption. During the storage of waste acid, as the temperature rises to ambient levels, the components mentioned above in the waste acid will continue to react, and these reactions will proceed more rapidly. If the aforementioned organic hydrocarbon—isooctane—is not recovered, “organic hydrocarbons and organic sulfates” will react in the waste acid storage tank to form high-carbon-chain polymers; these polymers are generally known as acid-soluble oils or “red oils,” and they contain large amounts of double-bonded conjugated dienes, C5 rings, and branched compounds. And these polymers can react with sulfuric acid to produce sulfur dioxide and water. Therefore, as time passes and the temperature rises (to around 30°C), the levels of sulfur dioxide and water in the waste acid increase, which further leads to a decrease in the H/C ratio of the polymer. This results in the formation of high-carbon-chain polymers and solid deposits, causing blockages in the boiler tubes of the cracking unit. Waste acid contains a high amount of organic hydrocarbons, and as it is stored for longer periods, this leads to an increase in high-carbon solid deposits, carbonization of some organic substances, and an abundance of iron ions. In the design of the cracking furnace, the residence time for the cracking of waste acid is kept within a certain range; however, impurities such as high-carbon solid deposits require a longer time to be processed, which leads to incomplete combustion and the formation of impurities like biochemical sulfur, thereby causing blockages in the tubes of the boiler section ; At the same time, high levels of iron ions can also form iron oxide at high temperatures, which, along with the aforementioned sulfides and other impurities, can clog the furnace tubes as well as the tubes of the air-flue gas heat exchanger. The aforementioned impurities are hard in texture and difficult to remove; as production continues, the pores become increasingly small, the pressure difference across the furnace tube increases, and ultimately production can no longer be sustained. The decomposition of the high-carbon chain structures formed from organic substances in spent acid requires fuel, which in turn leads to an increase in fuel gas consumption and oxygen consumption, as well as a series of other abnormal conditions.
I hope the original poster will share more original and high-quality content!
So in the end, to save trouble, the PP process from Austria was chosen, along with oxygen-enriched combustion to reduce ash content
The last edit to this post was made by Someone on 2019-12-6 01:31. There is one issue: your discussions regarding waste acid are based on the assumption that the hydrocarbons in it are mainly isooctane. But is that really the case? Most of the literature on the alkylation of concentrated sulfuric acid was published by Albright from Purdue University in the United States, and his studies do not seem to support your hypothesis. Furthermore, many attempts have been made to regenerate waste acid, but no effective solution has been found yet; extracting acid-soluble oils is very difficult. From an economic perspective, burning it directly might be the best option at present.
1. Well, what you say makes sense. This discussion isn’t about it necessarily having to be generated in this exact way; for example, the generation of high-carbon chain components is a rather broad concept, and it’s something I came up with on my own. It’s not possible to precisely explain how this reaction occurred; it’s merely a speculation. In fact, the reaction is too complex and my own knowledge is limited; I can only deduce the reasons based on the analysis tools available in our company and the actual production processes. It still can’t be compared to analyzing with foreign professionals. After all, the original poster is mainly involved in the actual production within the company, and what needs to be addressed are the issues that arise during that production process; please forgive any shortcomings. 2. The main organic hydrocarbon in the spent acid is isooctane; this is a conclusion drawn from samples taken during actual production and analyzed by the laboratory, rather than being an arbitrary assumption. 3. It is difficult to extract acid-soluble oils; I agree with this. Regarding the extraction of organic hydrocarbons from waste acid as mentioned above, the intention for producers is simply to use the simplest methods to achieve some degree of recovery; this approach aims to improve existing processes and bring tangible economic benefits to the company. It’s not as difficult as you think. It is currently not practical to completely separate the acid-soluble oil.