Why are the measurements of the bearing shell clearance obtained using the false shaft method and the lead wire compression method roughly the same?
Thread Content
Why do the results obtained using the fake shaft method and the lead wire compression method for measuring the bearing shell clearance be almost identical, with only a deviation of 0.01 mm? The tile consists of five equilateral tiles; due to the tilting effect of the tiles, it seems that for this five-tile structure, the correction factor of C=0.894 is not applicable. I consulted brick manufacturers, and their methods were similar with basically the same results. C=0.894 is the correction factor; is it applicable to five irregularly shaped tiles?
Stop joking – a deviation of 0.01 meters; is it really necessary to use lead wire for measurement? It can be measured with just the fingers.
:L, the input is incorrect. It should be 0.01mm