Heat exchanger diameter
Thread Content
The last edit to this post was made by qhhqhh on 2017-8-30 at 12:33. Two high-temperature (320°C, 1.5 MPa) heat exchangers connected in series were selected; an experienced employee in the company said, “It is necessary to verify the manufacturer’s production capabilities and practical application experience, and considering that 4 units connected in series might be a better option.” May I ask, is it difficult to manufacture a DN1600 heat exchanger under such operating conditions?
It’s not difficult. . . . . . . . . . . .
If the space permits, a parallel arrangement would be better. In series connection, the voltage drop issue must be taken into account. :lol
This post was last edited by qhhqhh on 2017-8-30 at 12:37. Well, it seems that if a small amount of heat exchange is sufficient, there’s no need to use so many units
Since there’s concern about this, switching to a more capable manufacturer would save half the cost.
Well, it seems this manufacturer has quite strong connections
What the veteran employees say makes sense! A temperature of 320 degrees and a diameter of 1600 mm – it’s not that it can’t be done, but it poses a serious challenge to the sealing mechanism! Insufficient machining precision or thermal deformation can easily cause leakage.
Who is this veteran employee? :lol
Nowadays, devices are generally becoming larger, and it is no problem to manufacture heat exchangers of this size.