HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

My experiences using SolidWorks for chemical equipment design

2018-07-19View Original

Thread Content

I majored in mechanical design; after graduation I worked on automation equipment for a few years. For various reasons, I ended up working in the field of chemical engineering machinery (used in the pharmaceutical industry), and I used SolidWorks for that work. Now I plan to study PDMS, and once I’ve completed that research, I’ll switch away from SolidWorks. These days, using SolidWorks for 3D design is becoming increasingly difficult, and the issues mainly lie in the following areas: 1) Although SolidWorks can be used for the design of chemical processing equipment, allowing for the creation of sheet metal parts, pipelines, and construction drawings, its pipeline layout functionality is more suited to the mechanical industry; when it comes to chemical processing equipment, it doesn’t deliver satisfactory results ; 2) SolidWorks has a dedicated Routing plugin for chemical processing equipment, which can be used for piping layout in such equipment. However, it has significant limitations; it’s fine for smaller chemical processing units, but when the equipment becomes more complex, it requires very high computer specifications. For piping layout in an entire chemical plant, it seems impractical to use this tool ; 3) SolidWorks cannot be used for the layout of equipment and piping in entire chemical plants, which is not conducive to future development; as experienced users on forums have said, SolidWorks is used by small companies for such tasks, while design firms and large companies do not use it. Please forgive any mistakes in what I have said above
Reply #22019-03-13
A master. There’s no need to feel sorry about not joining the society
Reply #32019-03-19
It’s important to choose the right direction for one’s efforts; thanks to the original poster for sharing! :hug:
Reply #42019-08-02
Expert :victory::victory:
Reply #52019-08-03
PDMS is also very difficult. I’ve been trying to learn it for over a month now, but I’ve made little progress. If you have time, we can exchange our experiences
Reply #62019-08-04
I’m also using SOLIDWORKS now; it’s fine for drawing membrane equipment, but not so good for drawing equipment in workshops. It’s too laggy. I’m currently learning CADworx. This feeling is simpler.
Reply #72019-08-05
SolidWorks is very resource-intensive; it requires a dedicated graphics card, and the fans keep running non-stop once the software is launched.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.