Definition of categories in the chemical engineering software exchange version

After a long separation, there must be reunion; after a long reunion, there must be separation! It’s related to popularity～

It’s normal for relationships to go through ups and downs; there’s no need to be too fixated on that. Do you communicate a lot with CAD? Do you mean I sent too much information? If we’re being thorough, many sections should be separate entities; too many of them make management difficult~~

What the original poster is referring to are mainly software for chemical process simulation; CAD, on the other hand, belongs to the category of software for drawing chemical machinery. Both fall under the umbrella of chemical engineering software, and they are temporarily grouped together for ease of management!

No, don’t get me wrong – it’s just my personal opinion that mechanical drawing software and chemical engineering software are not the same type of software; putting them together gives it a somewhat mixed feel. But upon further thought, I realize I might be being too picky. After all, this is a chemical engineering forum, and what was said on floor 4 makes quite sense as well

Yesterday, after the documents were uploaded, it was too late to process them promptly, and you happened to see them; they have since been processed. What you referred to as a \"large-scale issue\" was simply due to the fact that I didn’t process the documents in time after uploading them – it was an occasional occurrence. You saw those documents today, so please don’t worry about this problem. There aren’t many issues related to CAD communication usually, and all kinds of documents are uploaded, but they need to be processed one by one according to their categories; if tried to handle them all at once, things will get chaotic. If you have any suggestions, you can send a message directly to the person in charge of the section, @955559 955559, or to the administrator @sea7000. In my opinion, a search function and overly detailed partitions are unnecessary; they also distract from the efforts required for management.

What the leader said ✔ facilitates focused management. There are keywords available, which can be brought together when necessary.

This post was last edited by lys3903037 on 2019-1-27 at 12:52. That’s not what I meant; the moderator is overthinking it. I didn’t expect such a big reaction. I just thought it might be better to have two separate forums for discussion. As for mechanical drawing, I haven’t found any good forums where I can exchange ideas (the mechanical CAD forum used to be good, but it’s no longer functional). So sometimes I think about finding specialized resources for mechanical drawing (there are discussions on drawing software in this forum, but they’re not comprehensive, and there aren’t many good resources available. If there were a dedicated forum, would more people interested in drawing pay attention to it?) Will the information become more abundant? It’s just my personal opinion; it’s not mature enough and shouldn’t be posted. I don’t know how to delete it either. If possible, could you help me remove it?

Do you often use mechanical CAD as well? That forum is indeed not as good as it used to be; it seems to be left unattended. When I was working on design work before, I often looked for information. I remember there was a period of time when I couldn’t access those websites at all~~~ Back then, posts also had to go through approval~~~~

Yes, I used to visit it often, but I went there less over time. Approval is still required now, and there are fewer new posts as well. It’s true that it’s hard to find good forums for professional mechanical engineering these days; this forum is really great for chemical engineering!