Radar level gauge
Thread Content
I suddenly remembered something today. Is low-frequency radar better in terms of penetration, or is high-frequency radar better? For example, in environments with a lot of dust or mist, should low-frequency or high-frequency radar be used? Because the high-frequency device used before required frequent cleaning of the gauge head……
I think it’s low frequency, because with the same speed of propagation, the lower the frequency, the longer the wavelength, making it easier to bypass obstacles. I rarely use radar; I’ll just wait for the expert’s reply.
In such environments, there isn’t much difference – they are all difficult to measure…………
The environment is too harsh; neither low frequencies nor high frequencies work, not even those that are invisible to the human eye.
It can be used with high-frequency radar for purging; what medium is being measured, what is the range, and what is the feeding method?
Well, I was just talking about penetration; it’s not that it needs to be used actually. It was originally used on the circulating pool surface; frost formed in autumn and winter, which is really frustrating
It is said that Cologne has radar in the form of water droplets, which are more effective than those in horn shape. Additionally, in cases of high dust levels, contact the process engineering team for weighing if possible.
I think high-frequency is good; it can penetrate dust and receive feedback. For environments with dust, a radar without a flange can be chosen to minimize the risk of dust clogging. If you’re interested, feel free to leave your contact information; I can send you the details for you to take a look.