Guys, let’s discuss the project design process
Thread Content
Help, guys – is this layout (hierarchy) for the project design process appropriate? I have some suggestions for adding the missing parts; thank you
This post was last edited by ZhiGE on 2021-9-17 at 16:25. It seems that the table outlines the construction party’s guidelines for reviewing design documents, rather than the design process itself. The unified regulations for professional instrument design specify detailed requirements for the design and selection of instruments, systems, and analysis tools. Additionally, documents such as SPMP-STD-EM2001-2015, which outlines the requirements for the process design package of petrochemical plants (a comprehensive set of technical specifications), SPMP-STD-EM2002-2016, which specifies the requirements for the overall design of large-scale petrochemical construction projects, SPMP-STD-EM2003-2016, which covers the requirements for the foundation engineering design of petrochemical plants, SPMP-STD-EM2004-2016, which addresses the requirements for the foundation engineering design of petrochemical facilities, and SPMP-STD-EM2005-2016, which specifies the requirements for the detailed engineering design of petrochemical plants, all contain specific requirements regarding instrument design. HGT 20636.4-2017 Code for Professional Design Management of Automation Systems in Chemical Plants – Procedures for engineering design in the automation field. What is the purpose of this table?
An excellent analysis, thank you.