Thread Content
1. As shown in the picture, if this reactor has three layers of stirring (the blades are very close to the inner wall), the stirring speed is not fast, and the top-mounted liquid level gauge is used, is it feasible to use a non-contact radar level gauge? Is it possible to use it normally as long as the interference of the three blades is suppressed during on-site debugging? 2. When you encounter stirring situations, what liquid level meter is your first choice?
1. For the situation where the reactor shown in the figure has three layers of stirring, it is feasible to use a non-contact radar level gauge. Since the blade is very close to the inner wall and the stirring speed is not fast, it may cause errors in the liquid level gauge. During on-site debugging, it is necessary to suppress the interference of the three blades to ensure the normal use of the radar level gauge. 2. When encountering stirring conditions, people often prefer to use pressure level gauge or differential pressure level gauge. This is because these two liquid level gauges have better adaptability and stability and can provide accurate liquid level measurement results during the mixing process. However, the specific choice of liquid level meter needs to be decided based on the actual situation and needs. .
German VEGA radar level gauge can satisfy your wishes, I am not the manufacturer
Radar does it! Does the reactor have no side opening? We use a double flange, but it doesn’t feel as vigorous as yours.
If the liquid level is often lower than the top blade, it might be unstable.
If the liquid level is higher than the propeller, is there any error?