Thread Content
This post was last edited by qy576100527 on 2017-6-27 18:27. Comparison between low-temperature methanol washing and NHD. Comparison between low-temperature methanol washing and NHD; My personal summary of the comparison between low-temperature methanol washing and NHD is as follows: 1. In terms of plant scale, 2. Low-temperature methanol washing has a clear advantage in terms of plant scale. 3. Regarding operation, low-temperature methanol washing is easier to operate than NHD. 4. In terms of hazards, low-temperature methanol washing poses greater risks than NHD due to the presence of methanol. 5. As for energy consumption, the circulation volume in low-temperature methanol washing systems is lower than that in NHD systems ; Alcohols are way fewer, yeah ; The operating costs of the tower are low ; Low-temperature methanol washing technology abroad: Linde’s technology from Germany is suitable for Texaco gas
The NHD device is suitable for small devices
The NHD reagent also has a cost; it is expensive
The chemical stability, thermal stability, and gas consumption of low-temperature methanol washing are all better than those of the NHD process
Who has the process flow diagram for low-temperature methanol washing and related information? Please share it so I can study it: handshake
NHD is a technology from years ago – why isn’t it yet obsolete?