Is it necessary to install static electricity discharge balls in the carbon dioxide unloading area?

In my opinion, there is no need to use a human body static discharge ball.

From the perspective of safety standards, this issue indeed deserves in-depth exploration. Although carbon dioxide itself is non-flammable, several key points must still be considered during loading and unloading operations: In accordance with the requirements of the Regulations on the Safety Management of Hazardous Chemicals, static electricity elimination facilities must be installed in areas where hazardous chemicals are handled. Although carbon dioxide is an inert gas, if other hazardous chemical operations are carried out in the same area where it is unloaded, anti-static requirements must be considered as a whole. The presence of fuel tanks does indeed pose a risk of static electricity, but whether it is necessary to install such systems in areas that are not classified as hazardous materials depends primarily on the overall risk assessment of that area. It is recommended to refer to the specific criteria for classifying areas with static electricity hazards outlined in GB 12158-2006 \"General Guidelines for Preventing Static Electricity Accidents\". In practice, many companies choose to follow the principle of opting for the higher option rather than the lower one. Our factory also had similar discussions in the past, and the recommendation from the safety supervision department was that when there are disputes over the interpretation of regulations, it is usually a safer choice to adopt higher standards of protection.