HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is it more economical to use coker wax oil for hydrocracking or for hydrotreating residue oil?

2018-09-27View Original

Thread Content

For coker wax oil, is hydrocracking or hydrotreating of residue more economical?
Reply #22018-09-27
All of them can be visited. However, CGO has a greater impact on hydrocracking, including on the catalyst and the properties of the products; generally, the blending ratio is not very high. Of course, hydrotreating of residue oil is also a good option; the high reaction pressure and temperature enable its properties to be improved significantly. But the processed CGO still needs to go to the catalyst. I’ve seen the entire process of the factory. However, the poor quality of CGO is a torment for everyone. Generally, a dedicated paraffin oil hydrogenation unit is used for treatment.
Reply #32018-09-27
The feedstock for diesel cracking is heavy diesel; processing wax oil can severely affect the performance of the catalysts and reduce their service life. It is better to carry out hydrogenation of wax oil first, and then hydrogenate the diesel.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.