HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is it necessary to identify sulfur as a major hazard source?

2018-08-17View Original

Thread Content

According to the criteria for identifying major hazard sources, flammable solids classified as Category 1 in Table 2 require identification as major hazard sources, with a critical quantity of 200. However, sulfur packaging is classified into three categories – is it necessary to identify them? I’ve seen on the internet some say it’s not necessary, while others say it needs to be classified as a flammable solid. So I’m a bit confused and would like to ask those who know more to help clarify things for me. Thank you all.
Reply #22024-04-23
Sulfur does not require identification as a major hazard source; The hazard classification of sulfur is Flammable Solid, Category II; in GB18218-2018, the critical amount for Flammable Solid, Category I is 200
Reply #32024-09-27
Based on fire hazard classification, sulfur falls into Category B and Category C, and it is necessary to identify this

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.