HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Different companies should choose different physical scale inhibition methods

2025-06-05View Original

Thread Content

Although they are all chemical companies, some of them have explosion-proof requirements while others do not. Some of these companies produce mainly inorganic salt products, whereas others focus on organic products. For explosion-proof and non-explosion-proof enterprises, as well as those producing organic and inorganic products, different products and technologies should be chosen when selecting physical scale prevention and removal solutions: 1. Enterprises with explosion-proof requirements and those producing organic products – For scale prevention and removal in such enterprises, ultrasonic technology is the preferred option, especially long-pulse ultrasonic technology. Since ultrasound is a mechanical wave, it can meet the explosion-proof requirements of enterprises and can remove organic scale. However, if it is material scaling, long-pulse ultrasonic technology should be chosen, as its descaling capability is many times greater than that of short-pulse ultrasonic technology. Although both are ultrasonic methods for scale prevention and removal, be careful not to make the wrong choice. 2. No explosion-proof requirements and inorganic products: Chemical enterprises that produce inorganic products generally have no explosion-proof requirements. At this time, microwave scale inhibition and removal technology can be chosen; microwaves are a type of electromagnetic wave, so they cannot be used in explosion-proof environments. However, if there are no explosion-proof requirements, then using microwave-based scale prevention and removal is still a viable method for such purposes. For questions regarding physical scale prevention and removal, please contact via WeChat: TigerPeng2014
Reply #22025-06-06
By the way, good ultrasonic scale prevention methods, especially those that use long-pulse ultrasonics, are much more expensive than microwave-based scale prevention methods. Therefore, if it is suitable for applications involving microwave scale prevention, using microwave-based scale prevention and removal is more cost-effective.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.