Differences about water cooling towers
Thread Content
Recently, our company has built a new air separation equipment. Compared with other air separation equipment of our company, the outlet pipe of the water cooling tower has been lengthened, the internal packing of the water cooling tower has been reduced, and the amount of nitrogen and waste nitrogen going to the water cooling tower has been reduced. I personally think that lengthening the outlet of the water cooling tower is for environmental protection, mist elimination, water consumption reduction (extension of the outlet pipe wall should allow part of the water vapor to fall along the wall of the water cooling tower), and to save filler. Compared with another unit of our company, there is nearly 50m3 less filler layer. Is there anything else besides these points?
This is set according to the actual requirements of air separation. It is best to have a picture of the length of the outlet pipe extension. In fact, for users, they can just use what has been designed. As long as the overall principle has not changed, it is best to check the drawings for problems like this to see if there are structural requirements. Let's take a guess. Is it more accurate to lengthen the outlet pipe and increase the height? Because the outlet gas is nitrogen, is there anything wrong with safety if the height is too low? Is it too close to the operating room window? ? ?
We have also compared the parameter differences between the two sets of equipment before, but I mainly want to understand why we need to improve it in this way.
This is a picture of our site that is still under construction. You can see that the water cooling tower has a long nitrogen outlet pipe.
Oh, it should be about considering the safety of nitrogen to the nearby environment. For reference. It is recommended that you find the device diagram of this device and look at it. It is estimated that this is what it does.