HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

[Haichuan Chemical Environmental Protection News] Lianyungang Dipu Technology’s environmental protection equipment was put into use without proper inspection, resulting in a fine of 1.4 million yuan

2018-11-05View Original

Thread Content

According to the relevant announcements, the self-inspection and assessment report on environmental protection for the company’s project to increase annual production to 80,000 tons of 2,4-***chlorobenzene and 45,000 tons of sulfur black was reviewed and filed by the Guannan County Environmental Protection Bureau on September 30, 2016. The spray drying tower required for this project was completed in December 2016; however, the environmental protection facilities associated with it were put into operation at the end of March 2017 without undergoing acceptance procedures or passing inspections by environmental testing agencies. The Lianyungang Environmental Protection Bureau has imposed a fine of 800,000 yuan on the company, and an additional fine of 600,000 yuan on the person in charge of the project. Di Pu Technology stated that the company has paid the fines as required and promptly commissioned a qualified testing laboratory to conduct inspections; this has not had any significant impact on the company’s operations or financial situation. The company will strictly abide by relevant laws and regulations, earnestly fulfill its environmental protection responsibilities, and prevent similar incidents from occurring again.
Reply #22018-11-05
Environmental policies are becoming increasingly strict and rigid, leaving less room for maneuver or avoidance.
Reply #32018-11-06
Didn’t production testing already get canceled, and was the environmental impact assessment also carried out independently? It seems things weren’t made clear.
Reply #42018-11-06
I mean, is it definitely canceled! Pilot production is a weird practice; many project owners use it as an excuse to delay payment for the work done. In some cases, project owners simply refuse to conduct inspections during the pilot production phase

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.