Thread Content
This post was last edited by john1628 on 2015-7-20 08:26. It’s just an idea that came to mind; I think it’s cost-effective, but I’m not sure if it will be practical. I hope everyone can give their feedback. Three XMT628PID instruments (4-20mA) are used to control three relays respectively; one signal – the signal sent by the pressure transmitter – is supplied to all three instruments to make them operate, thereby controlling the opening degree of the valve. (Note: The gas pressure ranges from 4 kilograms to 0 pressure.) Consider the following: 1) The first instrument is set to transmit a signal of 16mA; when a pressure signal is received (assuming it is 4 kilograms – 3 kilograms), the pneumatic butterfly valve opens to 10% of its full capacity, which triggers the relay to start timing, and after 10 seconds the valve closes ; 2) The second fastest gauge is set to transmit a signal of 13mA; when a pressure signal is received (assumed to be 3 kgf – 2 kgf), the pneumatic butterfly valve opens to 15% of its full opening, which triggers the relay to start timing, and the valve closes after 10 seconds ; 3) The third gauge is set to transmit a signal of 10mA; when a pressure signal is received (assumed to be 2 kgf per 1 kgf), the pneumatic butterfly valve opens to 20% of its full opening, which triggers the relay to start timing, and the valve closes after 10 seconds. Please leave more comments; this will help to control the valve opening degree.
;P Look at what this child has been driven to become
I’m not sure what the owner wants to control; a PID controller can achieve control objectives very well by stabilizing the parameters. What can the owner accomplish by doing this?
What is the basis for it being cost-effective? If even the basic goals are not achieved, or if their achievement is unstable and unreliable, what use is cost-effectiveness?
This is an idea I have; I’m not sure if it’s feasible or not, so I’d like everyone to help me figure out whether this could work as a solution.