Thread Content
This post was last edited by liaifeng on 2018-8-5 at 17:12. Since the maintenance work on our equipment started, the exhaust emissions have remained high – much higher than in the previous cycle. We’ve been dealing with this issue for almost a month now. I’ll briefly describe the setup of our facility: it involves a Krass reaction, exhaust gas hydrogenation, absorption, and exhaust gas combustion. The design capacity is 4,000 tons per year, with a processing volume of around 700 cubic meters. Towards the end of the previous cycle, the load was so high that it reached 1,200 cubic meters. After maintenance, the processing capacity for acidic gases is now between 700 and 900 cubic meters, while the exhaust gas volume remains high. We have analyzed various possible causes, but the problem has not been resolved yet. We have ruled out issues related to leaks in the equipment valves as well as problems with the control parameters; we also suspect that there may be issues with the absorption efficiency of the absorption tower and the quality of the MDEA used (based on the sulfur content in the rich and lean liquids, the quality of the amine solution seems fine, but there still seems to be some problem with it – it’s hard to say for sure). I wonder if any of you experienced similar situations and have any insights to share
The poster seems to be in a joint group with me: lol
How much is your exhaust gas test? What is the hydrogen sulfide content in the raw material?
There are many reasons for excessively high exhaust gas levels. For example: (1) the shut-off valve that prevents gases from reaching the incinerator is not sealing properly; the valve itself does not function correctly. (2) Organic sulfur has not been reduced through hydrogenation. (3) It is unclear how the exhaust gas from your facility’s sulfur storage area is handled
It is possible to first have the exhaust gas analyzed for its total sulfur content, in order to determine whether the issue lies with the absorption process itself or with its efficiency. If it’s a problem with absorption, then the issue lies in the absorption process itself; if it’s a problem with the efficiency of absorption, then the problem lies with the absorption tower or the solvent used. Analyze and implement each item one by one to identify the real cause.
This method should not be able to meet **emission standards anymore, right?