HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What are the advantages and disadvantages of mechanically stirred clarifiers?

2015-09-01View Original

Thread Content

What are the advantages and disadvantages of mechanically stirred clarifiers?
Reply #22015-09-02
The advantage is the small floor area, while the disadvantage is that the separation effect is not as good as that of other sedimentation tanks.
Reply #32015-09-04
1. A mechanical accelerated clarifier is mainly composed of a first reaction chamber, a second reaction chamber, and a separation chamber. In addition, there are water inlet and outlet systems, chemical dosing systems, sludge discharge systems, and mechanical stirring and lifting systems; larger accelerated sedimentation tanks also have sludge scraping devices. The volume ratio between the second reaction chamber, the first reaction chamber, and the separation chamber is 1:3:7 or 1:2.5:7. 2. Working principle: A mechanically accelerated clarifier is a structure that combines coagulation, reaction, and sedimentation in a single tank through mechanical stirring for integrated treatment. Under mechanical stirring, the suspended layer of active sludge comes into contact with the water to which chemicals have been added, increasing the chances of particle collisions and thereby enhancing the coagulation effect. The separated clear water rises upward and flows out through the collection tank, while the sediment that settles back down is mixed mechanically with the water to which chemicals have been added; part of this sediment is then discharged regularly after being concentrated. Such pools have strong adaptability to changes in water volume and ion concentrations in the water, offer stable treatment performance, and high treatment efficiency. However, mechanical stirring requires a large amount of energy, causes severe corrosion, and is difficult to maintain.
Reply #42015-09-05
Advantages: (1) High processing efficiency; (2) Strong adaptability with relatively stable processing results; (3) Certain adaptability to treating water with high turbidity as well. Disadvantages: (1) A set of mechanical stirring equipment is required; (2) The investment cost is high; (3) Maintenance is rather troublesome
Reply #52015-09-06
We design high-density clarifiers and the associated equipment; for large water volumes, options with a good cost-performance ratio are preferred
Reply #62015-10-01
Which is better, a high-density clarifier or mechanical stirring?
Reply #72015-10-01
Advantages of mechanically stirred clarifiers: (1) High water production per unit area and high treatment efficiency; (2) Relatively stable treatment performance and strong adaptability. Disadvantages: (1) Requires mechanical stirring equipment; (2) Difficult to maintain. Applicable conditions: (1) Suspended solids content in the influent should be <5.0 g/L, with a temporary tolerance of 5–10 g/L; (2) Suitable for large and medium-sized water treatment plants

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.