Is it a professional contraindication, or a professional prohibition?
Thread Content
Let’s take a look: in GBZ188-2014, should it be referred to as “occupational contraindications” or “occupational prohibitions”?
It should be “professional contraindications”. Article 3.4 “Terms and Definitions” in GBZ188-2014 defines “occupational contraindication” as containing an obvious typo, because: 1. The English term for “occupational contraindication” is only one, namely “occupational contraindication”. 2. Define it as “the individual’s specific physiological or pathological condition related to a certain disease.” ”It indicates that it is a condition, and a “condition” is an expression of “symptoms”; therefore, in terms of its fundamental definition, it is also considered an “occupational contraindication”.
The moderator reads the standards very carefully; give them a thumbs up! Rigorous!
I thought it should refer to the character meaning \"symptom,\" but in the text it was always the character meaning \"document.\" I don’t know English either, so I thought there was something wrong with my version.
It should be “professional contraindications”.
It should be considered a contraindication for the profession； It is a symptom, as opposed to occupational diseases
I have also been confused by this for a long time. In practical work, “certificate” is still used. Let’s discuss whether it should be called “Middle East Respiratory Syndrome” or “MERS””