HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Help: Why are there both A-series and B-series pipes recommended in GB T17395-2008 \"Dimensions and Shapes of Seamless Steel Tubes\"?

2016-05-11View Original

Thread Content

Dear experts, when choosing DN350 pipes, I referred to the dimensions recommended in \"GB T17395-2008 Seamless Steel Pipe Dimensions\"; the size specified for Series 1 is φ356, which corresponds to Class A pipes. However, in practice, it seems that everyone chooses pipes with a diameter of φ377, which is a size not recommended by the standards. What is the reason for this discrepancy? . Please help resolve my sister’s confusion. .
Reply #22016-05-11
Personal opinion: Series A (imperial) is an internationally standard series that was introduced to China only in recent decades, while Series B (metric) follows the domestic standard series. Domestic companies* usually use the B series, as it is also cheaper.
Reply #32016-05-11
It’s just a difference between domestic and international standards
Reply #42016-05-11
Standardization of caliber for market release: It’s just a difference between domestic and international standards; In reality, it’s a matter of *habit in use. Regarding the current market inventory, all are in stock. But if all of them can be used, 377 will save a lot of money····
Reply #52016-05-12
356 is a British standard pipe, while 377 is a metric standard pipe. It seems that the domestic petrochemical industry uses imperial-sized pipes, so imported equipment must be equipped with such pipes as well. The light industry has always used metric pipes; I’m not sure if the chemical industry does the same, but I guess it does, as alcohol factories used metric pipes in the past. Actually, there is logic to the standard that recommends using imperial pipes first; after all, to integrate into the global market, if foreign projects use metric pipes, it will be very troublesome to replace them and have to import them from within the country
Reply #62016-05-12
Since it is not recommended, it seems that they will move closer to international standards in the future; however, the pipes in the old plants are still of type 377, so we have no choice but to make do with them.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.