Since there are dedicated people in charge of asking questions and providing answers, scoring shouldn’t be a matter of competition
Thread Content
Since there are dedicated people in charge of asking questions and providing answers, scoring shouldn’t be disputed. With a jump scoring system where 20 points are given at once, how should subsequent scoring be carried out? I saw the reminder, went to check the ratings, and when I opened it, the information was presented in a disjointed manner; some pages had few entries while others had many, and having to start from the beginning is a waste of time~~~ Wouldn’t it be better if everyone did their own job? Is it also to meet performance targets by the end of the year? Q&A sessions started in April, and I’ve never seen such sudden changes in scores. The examiner knows the number of questions at different scales; twenty questions at a time, and after that it’s no longer possible to continue scoring. 50 responses will use up today’s 1000 units of currency~~~~ Sometimes, at the end of the month, I receive 84 reminders in one day~~~~ If nothing happens, I just complain~~~~
That’s it! Generally, the person whose topic it is is responsible for it! It won’t impact the management capacity! Those who try to cheat will be discovered by the inspection team and faced with severe punishment. It’s really not easy to keep posting Q&A sessions! Keep it up
It shows that excessive management leads to deaths, and the assessment system has problems: lol
Stop scaring people like that; who is going to be punished? To what extent is the punishment severe? Besides seeing someone who rated the vests get dealt with, is there anything else?
Once it is discovered, it will be dealt with; everyone is welcome to report it
We generally pay more attention to the quality control of posts; any other content that does not comply with the rules is welcome to be reported or complained about! We will definitely cooperate actively and handle things as appropriate
It is recommended to list the punishments and provide updates on a monthly basis. Typically, it’s pinned for a while. Previously, the inspection team would provide monthly reports on the management of each region, but that is no longer the case.
I think it doesn’t matter who gives the ratings; it’s good that the management is willing to increase its own metrics a bit. The key is to have a uniform scoring scale; this kind of thing should fall under the category of arbitrary scoring
Q&A? Can the original poster see the reply in this mode, and can others see it as well? If you can’t see it, then rate it as...
Which post gives 20 at a time? Please send the link, original poster
Anything better than the standard answer earns 20 points without any problem; the key is that if it’s exactly the same as the given answer, then there’s no need for 20 points. I’ve encountered some truly excellent answers before; I would give them a score of 20 as well, with details that are several times more thorough than those in the suggested answers. Only the question setters know the scoring scale, and there are slight differences between multiple-choice questions and fill-in-the-blank questions, as these types of questions are scored manually, allowing for some flexibility in the scores to prevent cheating. The technical team earns only 1000 wealth per day, which isn’t enough for regular use; if everyone received scores of 20 or similar, it would be difficult to manage things properly. More scoring is allowed here, while older posts receive fewer points, as there is a limit on the number of scores that can be given per day. There were a few occasions a few months ago when posts were pushed down n times in one day; the system displayed a whole bunch of alerts~~~~