Some brief discussions on paddle mixers, frame mixers, and hyperbolic mixers
Thread Content
This post was last edited by A Le on 2016-11-5 18:40. For the PAC and PAM added, which type of mixer yields the best results? Any good recommendations? Thanks:victory:
Generally, different types of agitators are selected based on various process requirements and the properties of the materials. The PAM and PAC agitators I have seen are usually paddle-type. The paddle type is a mixer with a simple structure and the most balanced performance; it is used quite frequently ； Frame-type mixers are usually low-speed mixers, commonly used for mixing large volumes of media with high viscosity ； The main function of a hyperbolic mixer is to prevent sedimentation, and its role is somewhat similar to that of a propeller-type mixer. If there is anything incorrect, please feel free to point it out
Pulp-type – viscosity generally has a fast cycle. Frame-type – high viscosity, large heat transfer rate. We haven’t done much work with hypersurfaces, so I’m not familiar with them; I’ll ask other forum members to provide more information. Also, the design institute should give you answers during the design process. At the same time, you also need to choose based on your manufacturing process; nothing is 100% suitable, as every option has its advantages and disadvantages
Indeed, these should all have their model determined right from the start as part of the design parameters