HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The gaskets between the balls of the ball valve are available in 3.2/4.5 sizes; how should the distance between the mating surfaces of the valve body be designed?

2016-11-17View Original

Thread Content

Is it a little over 2, or exactly 3.2?
Reply #22016-11-17
For metal wound gaskets: the recommended compressed thickness for 3.2 mm gaskets is 2.3–2.5 mm, while the recommended compressed thickness for 4.5 mm gaskets is 3.2–3.4 mm. For reference only
Reply #32016-11-18
You can refer to the answer above; something of average quality will suffice
Reply #42016-11-23
This post was last edited by Haichuan Xiaozi123 on 2016-11-23 at 14:21. This degree of compression affects the torque of the valve as well as the lifespan of its sealing surfaces; are there any specific standards for this? I asked a colleague, and they said that under normal circumstances, 3.2 drops to around 2.8.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.