Thread Content
If calculating the amount of nitrogen needed to seal the storage tank using nitrogen levels, should it be based on the amount required by the vent valve? In other words, should it be based on the amount needed in cases of sudden temperature changes? Such an amount is too large, making it difficult to choose an appropriate control valve
The first is the change in physical strength caused by temperature changes, and the second is the volume of oil taken in and discharged.
The diameter of the nitrogen pipeline is selected based on the size of the storage tank, along with a nitrogen piping network at the appropriate pressure.
This actually depends on the specific project. For storage tanks, there are generally two methods for gas filling: nitrogen and air. However, the entry of air poses safety risks, so it needs to be avoided as much as possible; therefore, nitrogen is generally used for gas replenishment under normal circumstances. As for respiratory rate caused by extreme temperature changes, it is not recommended to use nitrogen supplementation, as this is an extreme situation that would represent a waste of investment
So for your regular nitrogen supplementation in design, do you only take into account the inflow and outflow volumes of the storage tank, without providing any parameters to the instruments regarding whether the maximum valve flow rate should account for climate changes?
In general, nitrogen supplementation in design takes into account the inflow and outflow volumes of the storage tank, with appropriate consideration given to thermal breathing. As for the maximum amount, air is generally added by breaking the vacuum valve