Additive usage

There are many types of additives, depending mainly on where you plan to use them

There are many manufacturers, and the quality varies greatly; it is necessary to be careful in making selections.

That’s why I’m doing some research to see which one is better

It mainly depends on the type of coal, and then on which company has stronger public relations skills!

Hunan Dongying: It is currently impossible to evaluate its performance due to the unpredictable nature of the coal type used: L

The additives used in the water-coal slurry gasification process mainly include water-coal slurry additives, flocculants, and dispersants for the ash-water system. Different coal qualities result in varying amounts of additives to be used and different proportions of the components in these additives. Currently, the quality of chemicals used in graywater systems varies greatly. Especially after the adoption of a system based on lowest bidding prices, many companies reduce the effective concentration of additives in order to win bids, opting instead for cheaper components. This leads to unstable operation of graywater systems, a shorter operational lifespan, and a higher rate of waste discharge. The **decline in profits has left many pharmaceutical companies without any incentive to improve the effectiveness of these additives; as long as no major problems arise, they will continue to have manufacturers use them. As for the operating cycles and waste discharge levels of those manufacturers, I have neither the obligation nor the resources to make any improvements. After changes in coal quality, the additives used in the ash water treatment system should be adjusted accordingly. However, many chemical manufacturers lack the capability and time to re-screen these chemicals, resulting in inconsistent performance of the ash water treatment system. In China, whenever a particular business becomes profitable, similar companies will emerge in large numbers very quickly, coming in various forms. There are many shell companies that lack the necessary products and technologies, as well as good performance; in order to win bids, they have to lower their prices. This results in very low profits for the additives used in this system. There are also many companies that, even after winning the bid, have had their contracts canceled by the manufacturers due to poor quality of the medications and inadequate subsequent management. As an additive supplier, to be honest it’s becoming less and less interesting to do this work; I’m considering changing careers these days. :'(

“How many companies have been harmed by winning bids at low prices? How much money and resources have been wasted? They’re all cars – how can an Otto worth tens of thousands of yuan be compared to an Audi worth hundreds of thousands of yuan? I’ve seen many companies win bids at low prices; once the equipment is installed, it doesn’t work properly, so they have to replace it with new equipment, ending up spending more money than they originally planned due to the low bid price. The wasted materials and resources are incalculable. Almost everyone is aware of the concept of \"value for money.\" Winning bids at low prices is a disadvantage for state-owned enterprises; it’s also a disadvantage for the owners of private enterprises. In the end, it’s \"humans harming themselves.\"