Chaos within central state-owned enterprises
Thread Content
This post was last edited by asdf2016 on 2018-2-23 at 16:08. The current company is a central state-owned enterprise, a manufacturing firm. In a company, when something good happens, those who have connections are the first to benefit. The person in charge of the company is an executive vice president, the highest-ranking one ； The person in charge of production is also a senior executive; there are some construction projects related to production as well. The person in charge refuses to allow the staff below to get involved in these projects. Previously, when workers from the construction company arrived, the vice president said that they had to pay for their food and accommodation here, so they left. A few days later, about a dozen people moved in again, staying at the facility free of charge, and this time the vice president said nothing. A few days ago, a pump at the site broke down; the valve couldn’t be sealed, and all the fluid inside leaked out, resulting in losses of several tens of thousands of dollars. Later, the vice president found out about it and privately asked our department head, murmuring about how such large losses could occur. Note that he asked in private. What do you all think? Are all central state-owned enterprises like this? Is that just how society is?
Do your own duty; where there are people, there is a world of affairs, and where there is such a world, there are conflicts over interests
There’s no such thing as a hierarchy barrier in this situation; it’s just an overthinking. Such things happen in every company, whether it’s a state-owned enterprise or a private one – it’s not a problem specific to one type of company.
It’s hard to speculate; there needs to be solid evidence for such things. But state-owned enterprises are just like that – you haven’t seen anything worse! ! To be honest, I haven’t seen it either; otherwise I wouldn’t be sending a message here! Don’t worry about it!
The nature of the enterprise is not important; what matters is how the managers manage it!
Our leaders often criticize me for having low emotional intelligence, and there’s nothing I can do about it; they all say that just by looking at me, they can tell I’m stupid
It’s written in such a messy way that it’s impossible to understand what’s being said. It seems like you’re a leader; your superiors often reach out to your subordinates bypassing you ； When a subordinate goes straight to a superior to talk without going through the proper channels, it is considered tattling, and it is considered taboo ； When a superior goes to talk to a subordinate bypassing the normal hierarchy, it is called going on an incognito mission to be among the people, and it is not a bad thing ； But incognito visits are certainly detrimental to local officials, indicating a lack of trust. If the situation is chaotic, just focus on doing your job properly; don’t try to take advantage of the chaos. Do your duty well so that they can’t find any fault with you. If pies really fall from the sky, for some people they represent an opportunity; for others, they are just pits dug by others.
The focus is on his muttering; what he’s muttering about is the shortcomings of the person in charge
Well, I’m the team leader; I’ve never thought about taking advantage of the situation. I have to be extremely careful at all times, worried that my supervisor might trick me. He often assigns me tasks, only to say later that what I did was useless
In society, it’s better to do more and talk less; doing one’s job well is more important than anything else.