With the implementation of National V standards for gasoline and diesel, how are manufacturers upgrading their production facilities?
Thread Content
As the title suggests, how are everyone’s hydrogenation units dealing with this situation? Is the product quality guaranteed? Let’s discuss it and expand our knowledge
Adding reactors, increasing the reaction depth, adding more reforming agents, and adjusting the feedstock are necessary to produce Euro 5 diesel.
I’m not sure whether with a sulfur content of 0.2% in our coker diesel, it will be possible to reduce it to below 10 ppm through hydrorefining; no tests have been conducted yet, so I’m uncertain
I just filled up with 95-octane fuel this morning; it’s said to help reduce PM2.5 levels
Old units may require catalyst replacement or the addition of a reactor. Our design meets National V standards, so there is no pressure involved; however, since the range is narrow, control is carried out at lower levels
After diesel hydrotreatment, the sulfur content in the refined diesel remains below 10 ppm, while ensuring the sulfur level of the feed oil.
Anyway, it’s a mandatory requirement; who knows, in a few years we might have National Standard 7 or 8
The indicators are static, but people are not; otherwise why would the fog problem keep getting worse? You understand
Hydrogenated wax oil is catalyzed. Gasoline hydrogenation, Grade 5 for export. Replacing the catalyst in diesel hydrogenation is done
The standards are constantly being raised, and there is ongoing improvement and optimization. . . Jingbiao No. 6 is already available. . .
We added a reactor for diesel hydrogenation, changed the process for gasoline hydrogenation, and adopted new catalysts, ensuring high product quality. In other words, the equipment required for upgrading to National V standards must undergo technical modifications; the existing equipment can only rely on raising temperatures, which makes it difficult to ensure both product quality and processing capacity