Changing from a headed deaerator to a headless deaerator
Thread Content
Our company’s deaerator was originally designed as a head-type deaerator with a capacity of 85 cubic meters per hour; however, since the water supply volume has increased to 160 cubic meters per hour, its deaeration capacity is no longer sufficient. We now want to convert this existing head-type deaerator with limited capacity into a headless STORK constant-flow nozzle deaerator with a capacity of 160 cubic meters per hour. Could experts please let us know if this is feasible?
Let the patent holder, STORK constant-speed nozzles, do the calculations for you, and conduct inspections after they are put into use.
It depends on the size, thickness of your head deaerator, as well as the location of the connections. An internal deaerator is equipped with many porous tubes. It depends on what’s after your deaerator to make a judgment.
The water volume has doubled; it’s necessary to determine whether the capacity of the headless deaerator is sufficient to meet your deoxidation requirements. With an output of 80 tons, the storage tank beneath the deaerator is also designed with an appropriate size. To make improvements, additional equipment will definitely be needed to ensure adequate deoxidation capabilities, and whether there is enough space is also a concern. If the design manufacturer deems it fine, then the acceptance after installation will be carried out.