Catalytic CO boiler
Thread Content
This post was last edited by h*ng on 2017-10-13 16:20. In catalytic design with CO boilers, is it better to use an incomplete combustion approach or a complete combustion approach? What is used as the basis for making adjustments? Thank you so much!
Are there afterburner measures? A waste heat boiler is generally a device that uses the excess heat from a system to generate hot water or steam; it does not provide any other means of combustion. Only when there is a requirement regarding the quality of the steam generated, and supplementary combustion is employed, do the concepts of complete combustion and incomplete combustion come into play!
As far as I know, if all of this CO is recovered, it’s absolutely remarkable! But it seems that few companies are using complete combustion these days, mainly due to equipment limitations!
We don’t have carbon monoxide boilers in our installations; it’s the first time I’ve heard of them.
It’s the waste heat boiler; generally, combustion is incomplete
It’s the waste heat boiler; generally, combustion is incomplete
Since it is designed as a CO boiler, it must be equipped for incomplete regeneration. CO boilers are now used less frequently; if an incomplete regeneration scheme is adopted, a CO burner + waste heat boiler setup is generally used. Of course, a CO boiler can also be used as a waste heat boiler; it is necessary to determine whether it meets the requirements for operation in a waste heat boiler capacity.
The CO incinerator generates more heat by completely burning CO; through catalytic oxygen-deficient regeneration, the activity of the catalyst and the amount of primary air used are controlled, which results in varying CO contents in the flue gas. Therefore, it is more practical to choose complete combustion of CO.