steam trap
Thread Content
In the absence of a condensate recovery system, select a energy-efficient and cost-effective steam trap.
Currently, steam traps have a relatively high failure rate. Domestic brands tend to fail easily during use, resulting in large amounts of steam being released into the condensate system, which leads to waste. Imported steam traps perform much better, but they are more expensive. It is recommended to choose the appropriate type based on the actual conditions of the installation. Condensate recovery is an energy-saving technical improvement, and the earlier it is implemented, the sooner the benefits will be seen
It’s better to carry out the modification of the condensate recovery process as soon as possible; steam traps simply don’t offer good quality at low prices.
Inexpensive check valves have high leakage rates, which is not cost-effective in the long run
Condensate recovery places higher demands on steam traps, as well as requiring a higher back pressure. I recommend using venturi-type steam traps, which are not affected by back pressure, operate stably, have low leakage, and do not need to be replaced for 10 years.