Just the planar approach
Thread Content
This post was last edited by w986177019 on 2017-1-13 at 16:09. In actual construction, it is the upper side that is used on one side only. May I ask, what is the basis for this? It’s not very convenient during actual installation
I just want to know if this is how it’s done in all cases, as shown in the picture
It’s not a structural engineering field; construction should be carried out according to the drawings.
During design, it can be oriented either upward or downward; provided that the angle steel type, spacing, and thickness of the decking plates remain the same, the design shown in the drawings provides higher load-bearing capacity.
Oh, in the first schematic diagram, the plate angle steel is fixed to the plate, with no direct connection to the primary and secondary beams; it’s not very practical to use in practice, as the spacing between the secondary beams varies.
It is standard practice to have the tips of the angle steel bars point upward
The first schematic shows angle steel welded to the plate, with no direct connection to the primary and secondary beams; it is possible to prefabricate it by welding first and then laying the plate. It is the correct approach; the on-site photos show that the construction party has created small frame secondary beams to facilitate construction. After the slats were laid, they were not welded to the board (due to the high difficulty of construction), which affected the stiffness of the board. Fails to meet the design requirements