Thread Content
It’s just like what those officials say – politically correct and lengthy, but it’s all nonsense; it’s completely useless!
You’re also underestimating the SH mark. How about you create a truly useful \"Unified Standard for Quality Inspection of Petrochemical Installation Projects\"?
Quality acceptance regulations suitable for the petrochemical and chemical industries, such as requiring the signature of the general contractor and performance assessments, etc.; these are superior to GB 50252
SH3508 is quite useful as a guide for classifying petrochemical installation projects. However, the content of the quality inspection records for each batch is entirely blank, and it is not compatible with the current regulations; since the installation standards have not yet defined which items are critical and which are routine, it is necessary to rewrite the specifications for each item, which presents certain difficulties.
SH/T 3508 is used for project quality inspection; quality inspection must be carried out after the completion of any project, otherwise handover and delivery cannot take place. It should be applied in conjunction with the various professional standards for construction quality inspection.
Basically, this information is not needed anymore, but it is still required in some places
A standard that consists only of a framework without any actual content is extremely complicated to implement and holds little practical value. Currently, those that are actually used for quality inspection don’t even compare to 50252