HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Abnormalities observed during the determination of the cold filter point of diesel after adding antifreeze agents

2017-11-15View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by chicanpk on 2017-11-15 at 10:47. SH/T 0248-2006, \"Method for Determining the Cold Filter Plugging Point of Diesel and Domestic Heating Oil\", defines the cold filter plugging point as the highest temperature reached when the sample is cooled under specified conditions; at this temperature, the sample cannot flow through the filter, or it takes more than 60 seconds for 20 ml of the sample to flow through the filter, or the sample cannot completely flow back into the test cup. This value is expressed in \"°C\" as an integer multiple of 1°C. In one of these cases, the sample cannot flow back completely into the test cup. I have never understood why this happens – if it can go up, why can’t it flow back? However, since this situation is hardly ever encountered, no effort was made to analyze its reasons. Recently, cold filter point tests were conducted on various diesel fuels and different antifreeze additives, and it was observed that the samples did not flow back completely into the test cup. I would like to ask everyone for insights into the reasons behind this phenomenon. Below are some of the specific data from our tests. We selected 4 types of National V 0# diesel, purchased from Sinopec as well as 3 private gas stations. Among them, Sinopec and 2 private gas stations have a cold filter plugging point of -6°C for their diesel, while another private gas station has a cold filter plugging point of -1°C for its diesel; we denote this diesel as A. The blank cold filter plugging point for all diesel fuels was normal, with the time taken for 20 ml of the sample to pass through the filter being greater than 60 seconds. We selected various antifreeze agents (diesel low-temperature flow improvers) and conducted experimental analyses at the same proportions; it was found that the cold filter point of the diesel decreased significantly after adding these agents, with the reduction amount being around 10°C or even more. In the case of diesel sample A, when determining the cold filter plugging point, after adding all the antifreeze agents, the phenomenon occurred in which the sample could not flow back completely into the test cup (at this point, it took about 12 seconds for 20 ml of the sample to pass through the filter). Moreover, this phenomenon occurred at the same temperature range, namely from -1°C to -11°C. Our analysis should be related to the properties of that oil sample. Later, during the testing process, the tester conducted another measurement once the cold filtration point was reached, that is, when the sample could no longer flow back completely into the test cup. It was found that the sample could pass through the filter, and after filtration stopped, it could still flow back into the test cup smoothly; it was not until -15°C that the phenomenon occurred where it took more than 60 seconds for 20 ml of the sample to pass through the filter. However, in accordance with the standard specifications, we still determine its cold filter point to be -11°C. Since I had never encountered this phenomenon before, I wasn’t sure what to do. Could any teacher provide an analysis and explanation for this situation? Is it a normal phenomenon? Thank you!
Reply #22017-12-07
The preferred determination for the cold filter point is -11°C. Secondly, the reason for this phenomenon is that if sufficient quantities and sizes of wax crystals precipitate from the sample only at -11 degrees, the vacuum applied during suction filtration exerts a certain force, whereas the natural flow back into the test cup relies on the gravity of the oil sample itself. Due to the deposition of certain wax crystals on the filter screen, the oil cannot flow back into the test cup. During the subsequent tests, repeated filtration disrupted the structure of the wax, resulting in it taking until -15 degrees for 20 milliliters of the sample to fail to pass through the filter within 1 minute. Another issue: the normal reflux can still occur at the temperature just below the cold filter point, because after filtration by vacuum, the oil sample flows back into the test cup, causing the temperature to rise by two to three degrees.
Reply #32017-12-08
Thank you for your reply and explanation; I personally find it quite reasonable. Repeated suction filtration should have a certain effect on the crystalline structure of the wax.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.