HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Calculation problem of cone shells with different thicknesses at the same half vertex angle, please ask

2013-12-31View Original

Thread Content

There is an existing equipment with a design pressure of 2.16Mpa, a design temperature of 130, a diameter of the big end of the cone shell of 2000, and a diameter of the small end of 109. If calculated based on the entire cone, the calculated thickness of the big end transition section of the cone shell and the cone shell connected to the big end transition section is too large, 25.9mm, while the calculated thickness of the small end and small end reinforcement section only needs about 3mm. If the thickness is uniform, the thickness of the small end will be 26. However, if the diameter of the small end is too small and the thickness is too large, it will be difficult to process, so I want to calculate the cone shell segmentally. Here is how I calculated it, first calculate the cone shell as a whole 1: Calculate the thickness of the big end flange and the thickness of the cone connected to the big end flange: 2: Calculate the thickness of the small section and the length and thickness of the reinforced section at the small end. I calculated the 12mm thickness at the middle section directly using the cone shell calculation formula based on the inner diameter of the section. Then I did not consider strengthening the section like the large and small ends of the cone. I don’t know if there is any problem with my calculation like this. Please give me some advice. Thank you.
Reply #22013-12-31
I have not calculated it. You can take the design wall thickness in sections and calculate it based on the tapered head. 1) The wall thickness at the big end and the connection is calculated as the thickness, but the length should be the length of the reinforced section at the big end. The middle section should be calculated as the thickness of the head. The value of the small end and its reinforced section should be no less than the calculated thickness of the small section and the calculated thickness of the head.
Reply #32014-01-02
Brothers, don’t tell me, it should be okay? It makes my heart feel numb

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.