Different understandings of the scope and categories of tolerance specifications 1.3–1.4
Thread Content
If a device falls under Clause 1.4 of the regulatory standards, is it then subject to those regulatory requirements?； If it is not subject to regulation, then would it not be classified even if condition 1.3 is met? How do everyone understand it?
Vessels over 30L require classification; pressure vessels falling within the ranges of 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 are all subject to supervision and inspection.
This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-7-26 at 08:57. If a device falls under Article 1.4 of the regulatory provisions, it is still subject to those regulations; please refer to the explanations provided in the revisions to TSG 21-2016, \"Safety Technical Inspection Regulations for Fixed Pressure Vessels\"
Meets 1. Items numbered 3 must definitely be classified, but those classified into one category do not necessarily require on-site supervision by a special inspection center
This post was last edited by happy4153 on 2017-7-26 09:14. In other words, supervision and inspection are still required, and it should be handled in accordance with the aforementioned procedures. But the main text doesn’t mention the need for supervision and inspection – isn’t that contradictory?
This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-7-26 09:34; the main text doesn’t state that supervision and inspection are not necessary. Both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 must meet the requirements set out in Chapter 1, General Provisions, of the Fixed Capacity Regulations; please note that 1.11 in Chapter 1 deals with the requirements regarding supervision and management.
I didn’t notice 1.11; since chapter 6 wasn’t mentioned earlier, I thought there was a contradiction. . .
Where did the modification notes come from? Neither the first modification order nor the newly revised version from 2021 includes such notes
The last edit to this post was made by SDHZZXM on 2022-8-12 at 13:19; the revision notes are located after the specifications