HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The dimensions of the Class900 long neck flange DN80 are even larger than those of the DN65 version

2018-09-09View Original

Thread Content

These past few days, while checking the dimensions of the Class900 long-neck flange DN80, I found that they are smaller than those of the DN65 version. Checking the errata for May 2012 shows no changes. Moreover, all the dimensions of Class 900 DN80 pipe flanges are smaller than those of DN65. I think this is clearly a mistake; surely the experts responsible for formulating the standards at the Chemical Equipment Center were confused and failed to notice this error. I hope those responsible for publishing books at the Chemical Equipment Center have some sense of responsibility and avoid producing such shoddy books. This is the standard, and it has a tremendous impact.
Reply #22018-09-10
That’s correct; for CLASS900 flanges, as well as flanges with a diameter of DN80 or less, the design pressure rating is higher than that for flanges with a diameter larger than DN80.
Reply #32018-09-10
Look at the explanation on the top right side of page 269

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.