When the thickness of the ear pad plate is greater than that of the cylinder, should it be set to the same as the cylinder’s thickness? Is further calculation needed?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by *aozhi8611 on 2020-1-10 at 11:07. The diameter of the cylinder is DN2800, with a wall thickness of 8 mm. According to the standards, B6 ear seats are to be used; the thickness of the ear seat backing plate is 12 mm, and the material used is 2205. The ML bending moment calculated according to the appendix is within acceptable limits. Is it possible to use an ear seat backing plate with a thickness of 8 mm instead? The equipment is filled with packing, and the weight of the packing in the equipment is approximately 12 tons.
It is best to design in accordance with standard requirements, as the standards already represent the minimum requirements
If the standards do not apply, then calculation is required
Hello, may I ask what the intensity is? Under the ear seat standard, one Q value is calculated and one MT value is calculated; so what needs to be calculated after the shimming plate is thinned? I still haven’t found the basis for the calculation; please advise. Thank you
Well, yes, I think it’s necessary to do some calculations too. What exactly needs to be calculated? Apart from Q and MT required for the ear seats, which have little to do with the thickness of the shims, what needs to be calculated regarding the shims?
Where should it be calculated? Could you give a rough idea? Thank you
Where should it be calculated? Could you give a rough idea? Thank you