HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Ten common misconceptions about special equipment

2024-12-28View Original

Thread Content

Myth 1: Electric forklifts do not need to be registered. Some sellers mislead companies that purchase forklifts, making them believe that only diesel (or gasoline) forklifts require registration, while electric (battery) forklifts do not. As a result, these companies are fined by the market supervision authorities for using forklifts that have not been inspected and registered. In fact, any forklift that meets the definition of special-purpose motor vehicles within the \"Catalogue of Special Equipment\" falls under this category. Simply put, forklifts that possess three key features – a mast, forks, and a self-propelling mechanism – and are used in areas such as factory premises, tourist attractions, and amusement parks all constitute special equipment. This includes pallet stackers that meet the relevant definition, and all such devices must undergo registration (and be assigned a license plate) in accordance with the provisions of the \"Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safety of Special Equipment\". Myth 2: Companies with fewer than 20 special equipment units do not need safety managers. Although the \"Rules for the Use and Management of Special Equipment\" (TSG 08-2017) stipulate that companies with 20 or more such units must have certified safety managers, it does not mean that companies with fewer than 20 units are exempt from having safety managers. The actual situation is that all entities that use special equipment must appoint safety managers for such equipment; this appointment shall be documented in official appointment letters, which are then kept in the records related to the special equipment. If the total number of devices exceeds 20 (including 20), then full-time safety managers who hold relevant certificates must be appointed. Myth 3: Air storage tanks with a volume of less than 31 cubic meters are not considered special equipment. This statement is likely a confusion with simple pressure vessels; simple pressure vessels are a type of special equipment that does not require registration for use or regular inspections – it is only necessary to dispose of them once their service life has expired. The method for identifying simple pressure vessels is also straightforward; usually, the word “simple” or “simple pressure vessel” is indicated on their factory nameplates. A more professional way to determine this is by examining the parameters: the design pressure should be ≤1.6 MPa, the volume should be ≤1 m3, and the product of pressure and volume should be ≤1. The medium used is mainly air or steam. Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether an air storage tank belongs to a simple pressure vessel based solely on its 1 cubic meter volume; instead, identification must be done through the equipment’s nameplate or factory documentation. It is important to emphasize that although the tank itself does not require registration or inspection, safety accessories such as safety valves and pressure gauges installed on the tank still need to be calibrated and inspected in accordance with the law. Myth 4: Elevators that have passed inspections should not experience failures. Inspections are **verifying checks on the safety of an elevator’s daily use as well as its maintenance conditions; the relevant inspection items represent the minimum standards for elevator safety. In other words, passing an inspection indicates that the elevator’s safety meets only **the required minimum standards. If elevators are compared to people, then annual inspections are akin to regular health check-ups. The fact that no problems are found during such checks does not mean that the person will not fall ill in the following year. Similarly, whether an elevator develops faults depends on proper daily management and maintenance. Therefore, only by ensuring proper daily management by the using unit, proper fulfillment of its responsibilities, and effective supervision of maintenance and repairs can the probability of elevator failures be reduced to a minimum. Myth 5: Truck cranes are the same as tire cranes. Although wheel-mounted cranes are listed in the \"Catalogue of Special Equipment,\" truck cranes are not included there; these two are entirely different types of equipment. The main difference between the two lies in their operation cab: a tire crane falls under the category of special equipment and has only one operation cab used for controlling movement and lifting loads, whereas a truck crane is not considered special equipment; it has not only a vehicle driving cab but also another cab for operating the crane, and therefore it is not subject to the \"Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safety of Special Equipment\" and the \"Regulations on the Supervision and Management of Personnel Working with Special Equipment.\" Myth 6: Since ordinary people use liquefied petroleum gas cylinders for cooking, they are considered the users of these cylinders. The \"Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Safety of Special Equipment\" and the \"Technical Regulations for Gas Cylinder Safety\" both stipulate that the user of a gas cylinder is the entity responsible for its filling. It is the act of filling the cylinder that falls under the scope of regulation regarding special equipment. Moreover, gas cylinder filling entities are only allowed to fill cylinders that are in their own ownership according to the law; therefore, ordinary people are the ones who \"use the gas\" rather than those who \"use the cylinders\". Although households with liquefied petroleum gas cylinders are not considered users falling under the scope of special equipment regulation, the use of liquefied petroleum gas must still comply with the relevant laws and regulations set by the authorities in charge of gas management. Myth 7: Hydraulic lift platforms can be used as “cargo elevators”. A “cargo elevator” is another name for a simple lift; those with a rated lifting capacity of over 500 kilograms are considered special equipment. Although hydraulic lift platforms do not fall under the category of special equipment, some companies still install them in shafts within factories or in makeshift shafts constructed from materials such as bricks, wood, and iron plates. They then add components such as floor selection panels, door locks, limit switches, and guide rails, turning these platforms into “illegally manufactured, illegally installed, and illegally used” special equipment – what is commonly known as “home-made elevators”. Not only are the organizations that use such platforms subject to penalties, but those responsible for their installation also face legal consequences. Myth 8: **Since the operation certificates for cranes have been revoked, anyone can operate them.** Cranes fall under the category of lifting machinery as listed in the \"Catalogue of Special Equipment.\" In previous years, the State Administration for Market Regulation abolished the certification requirements for cranes that are operated from the ground, but it still retained the certification requirements for cranes operated from a control cabin, as well as for tower cranes and other types of lifting machinery. Additionally, the \"Rules for the Use and Management of Special Equipment\" and related technical standards stipulate that for equipment for which ground-operation certifications have been revoked, the employers must still provide pre-job training and safety education to the relevant operators. Not everyone is allowed to operate cranes; otherwise, it would violate the relevant provisions of the \"Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safety of Special Equipment.\" Myth 9: Special equipment can be managed by a third party. Safety regarding special equipment places great emphasis on the responsibility of the entity in charge of its safety. However, many organizations that use such equipment, especially those responsible for managing elevators, tend to equate elevator maintenance services with their own responsibilities for daily management. In reality, the companies that provide maintenance services act merely as an equivalent to an elevator’s “4S store”; therefore, when an accident occurs with an elevator, it is the vehicle owner who is held accountable by the traffic authorities, not the “4S store”. Of course, for special equipment that is owned jointly, such as the elevators in residential complexes, they belong to all the owners. Therefore, in accordance with the Regulations on the Management of the Use of Special Equipment, all the owners or the owners’ committee entrust a property management company to manage the elevators through a contract; the property management company assumes primary responsibility for the safety of these elevators, and is responsible for carrying out regular inspections, registering their use, conducting periodic tests, and signing maintenance contracts. For elevators rented out along with the building, if the lease agreement stipulates that the tenant is the entity responsible for their operation and management, then the tenant bears the primary responsibility for safety. In the absence of such a provision in the contract, the owner of the elevator is the legal entity responsible for its operation and management. Myth 10: Special equipment does not need to be submitted for inspection as long as its inspection validity period has not expired. According to the Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China regarding special equipment, the entities that use such equipment must submit applications to the inspection and testing agencies within one month after the expiration of the equipment’s inspection validity period. This requirement is based on two main considerations: firstly, it allows the inspection agencies to arrange the necessary inspectors in advance, ensuring that the inspection of special equipment in a given area can proceed smoothly ; On the other hand, if potential issues and faults in various devices are detected during the inspection process, reporting them in advance provides sufficient time to make necessary corrections before the expiration of the inspection period. After these corrections, it becomes possible to obtain a qualified report on schedule, thus avoiding any gap between two inspections.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.