HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Welding of 304H and issues related to post-weld treatment

2019-11-26View Original

Thread Content

Dear all Haoyou users, I have a question: for the heated surface tubes welded from 304H material, what pressure is used for the pressure test? 1.5 times? 2 times? What medium is being used? Will tap water work? Must it be demineralized water? I saw on other websites that if water is drained immediately after the pressure test, chlorination measures may not be necessary. Then, 304H is welded using A102 TIG welding wire with argon shielding; is heat treatment required after welding? Tube with φ76*5.5 dimensions, at a pressure of 6.3MPa
Reply #22019-11-26
Drain it thoroughly after the hydrostatic test, and there is no need to control the chloride ion content. For austenitic stainless steel, heat treatment should be avoided as much as possible after welding; if heat treatment is necessary, solution treatment must be carried out, which is not feasible for shaped pipes!
Reply #32019-11-27
The specification requires that the Cl ion content in stainless steel be less than 25 ppm
Reply #42019-11-27
A102 is a welding rod grade used for arc welding; its corresponding model is E308. It is not an TIG welding wire, with the corresponding model for TIG welding wires being ER308H. Welding materials with a ‘H’ in their designation are generally hard to find. If a carbon content of more than 0.04% is required, then welding materials with an actual measured carbon content of 0.04% or higher can be selected.
Reply #52019-11-27
Wouldn’t 25 ppm result in a conductivity of 0? . . Is it 25mg/L? Was the unit careless?
Reply #62019-11-27
So, may I ask which new regulation states that control is not required? Our inspection agency is insisting on this point and refusing to allow pressure testing, so we need a document explaining it
Reply #72019-11-27
1ppm = 1mg/L
Reply #82019-11-27
It depends on the standards applicable to your pipeline; currently, the pressure vessel standard GBT 150 already permits this.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.