Thread Content
The primary reason for using carbon steel (CS) at the bottom of regeneration tanks is its sufficient corrosion resistance under specific operating conditions as well as its cost-effectiveness; as long as temperature and stress conditions are properly controlled, carbon steel can be safely used in alkaline environments. The operating conditions are relatively mild: the bottom of the tank remains below the liquid level for an extended period, resulting in minimal temperature fluctuations; this prevents the evaporation and concentration of alkali solutions, thus avoiding the risk of alkali embrittlement caused by high concentrations of alkali. When the temperature of the alkaline solution is kept below 46°C, the corrosion rate of carbon steel in static alkaline solutions is low, and its structural stability remains good. Stress can be eliminated through heat treatment: the biggest risk with carbon steel is that welding residual stresses may cause alkaline embrittlement. After stress elimination through post-weld heat treatment (PWHT), carbon steel can effectively prevent cracking in low-temperature alkaline environments, meeting the requirements for long-term operation. There is a clear cost advantage: the bottom area of the tank is large, and using 304 stainless steel would significantly increase the cost of the equipment. While ensuring safety, the use of carbon steel can significantly reduce material costs, in line with the principles of engineering economics. Therefore, under conditions of low temperature, no evaporation, and stress relief, carbon steel is a suitable choice for the bottom of regenerative tanks.
The original poster has analyzed this very well; carbon steel is indeed a cost-effective and practical choice in low-temperature alkaline environments. Two additional pieces of experience for reference: In actual operation, it is recommended to regularly monitor the pH value and temperature at the bottom of the tank. In our project, local corrosion accelerated due to the accidental mixing in of acidic substances; installing online pH monitoring solved this problem effectively. Special attention must be paid to the parameters for post-weld heat treatment. Even after performing PWHT in accordance with the standards and conducting PT tests, microcracks were still detected; eventually, the holding time was increased by 15% to achieve the required standards. It is best to conduct process evaluation by considering the material thickness along with the specific parameters. These experiences are for reference only; for specific implementation advice, consult a professional pressure vessel engineer.