Does Aspen need to eliminate all warnings?
Thread Content
Does the Aspen simulation require all warnings to be eliminated? Once the simulation process is complete, the result \"result available\" is displayed. But there are warnings in the Summary of Simulation Errors. That is, Physical Property System Simulation Terminal Errors: 0 0 0; Severe Errors: 0 0 0; Errors: 0 0 0; Warnings: 2 0 21. Is it necessary to eliminate all of these warnings? The warnings mainly state that the two property calculation methods selected for my process simulation, UNIQUAC and RK-SOAVE, interfere with each other. There are also messages such as \"THE FOLLOWING CONVENTIONAL COMPONENTS WERE NOT IN A DATA BANK. CHECK DATA BANK NAMES FOR SPELLING.\" Additionally, there’s an issue with the CID data bank name: 3-C3H6O2 should be listed as C3H6O2. Another warning relates to the parameter DHVLWT/ELEMENT 4 (DATA SET 1): the lower bound for component 3-C3H6O2 has been violated, with a value of -16.978 while the lower bound is set at -2.0000. Will these warnings have a significant impact on the simulation results?
Theoretically, it needs to be eliminated; otherwise the results won’t be that accurate.
This substance is not available in any of the component libraries. You should select several more component libraries, including one that contains the substance you need. That will do