【Industry Technical Exchange Area】Special Thread for Distributing Moderator Bonuses in June
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Chemical Enthusiast on 2012-6-30 at 19:27. First and foremost, I would like to thank all the moderators for their support and cooperation towards me and the industry section throughout June. I hope that in the days to come we will continue to work together to create an excellent platform for technical discussions. The following is an explanation regarding the bonus distribution in June and related matters: 1. Standard explanation: Due to changes in the metrics used for measuring management workload within the forum in June, appropriate adjustments will be made starting from this month based on the new standards for such measurement. 1. The amount of bonus due this month = Posts posted on the 30th × 2 + Management tasks completed this month × 1 + Time spent online this month × 3 + Other factors; no bonus is awarded if the time spent online is less than 15 hours and the number of management tasks completed is less than 90. 2. Those who have spent over 80 hours online and carried out more than 240 management actions can be rated as excellent moderators, receiving +20 Charm and +1 Prestige on top of their regular rewards ； Those with an online time of over 50 hours and more than 150 management actions can be rated as excellent moderators, receiving +10 charm on top of their due rewards ； Moderators who have been online for 15 hours (provisional) or more and have carried out 90 management actions or more can be considered qualified moderators ； Moderators with less than 15 hours of online time (provisional) or fewer than 90 management actions are classified as moderators who need to improve, while those who fail to meet either criterion are considered unqualified moderators. 3. The super-editor assistant and the person in charge of a section receive a 20 Charm subsidy; for those sections where only one person is involved in management, a special reward will be given by the super-editor. 4. The “Regional Affairs Participation Award” listed in the bonus table refers to those moderators who actively participated in the discussion threads related to the management team’s work in the [Industry Technology Exchange Area]; for valid discussions held in June, they will be rewarded with 50–100 wealth points depending on the depth of their contributions. 5. Those rated as inadequate moderators for two consecutive months, or as moderators who need to improve their performance for three consecutive months, will be returned to the regular group. If the number of management tasks performed is 10 or less, and no special leave has been taken or any explanation provided, they will be directly returned to the regular group for that month. II. Appointment and Removal Announcements 1. This month, five new moderators have taken on their roles: in the Chlor-Alkali section, they are zmxrrx, lxb100200, and O.K.; in the Polymer section, it’s mxsilence; and in the Fine Chemicals section, it’s yhwh*. On behalf of the management team of this industry section, I extend a warm welcome to all of them. I hope that the existing moderators will provide timely assistance and guidance to these new ones. 2. This month, the following three moderators were reverted to the regular group due to inadequate management: mian726 from the polysilicon forum, melao from the sulfuric acid forum, and Pei Qinghua. III. Summary of Regional Management 1. This month, it was requested that the chlor-alkali section, the polysilicon section, and the sulfuric acid section carry out the “Electric Tiger Weekly Star” selection activity. The chlor-alkali section and the polysilicon section have already begun the preliminary preparations and developed detailed plans for this activity; they are hereby commended for this. To date, no effective action plan has been formulated for the sulfuric acid edition, and the moderator in charge failed to communicate promptly with the super-edit management team; criticism is expressed in this regard. 2. This month, the deputy moderator of “Standing in the East” published dedicated posts on management separators across all sections; for details, please refer to the guidelines and requirements regarding management separators in the [Industry Technology Exchange Area]. The implementation status in the metal smelting section and the chemical analysis section was not satisfactory, so relevant moderators should pay attention to this. 3. This month, special praise was given to SWL, the main person in charge of the chlor-alkali section. The three moderators recommended by SWL performed excellently, and SWL himself also had an outstanding performance; under his leadership, post management was carried out in a timely manner. IV. Reply format: Username: Actual bonus amount: Management insights: V. Based on the management performance this month and in the previous months, the moderators Chlor-Alkali Version’s swl, Polysilicon Version’s *ng*ng916, Fine Chemicals Version’s That makes sense and Zone Deputy Super Moderator Version’s Standing in the east were awarded the title of Excellent Moderator. VI. Any matters not covered above shall be interpreted by this super edition; if you have any objections, please contact me via private message!
This post was last edited by Chemical Enthusiast on 2012-6-30 at 13:58
Username: wang*nnan_126 Actual bonus received: 800+10 (quite a lot indeed.) . . ) Management insights: Keep learning*, and I’m getting better at it more and more
Username: mxsilence Actual bonus awarded: 200 Management tips: I’ve been in this role for only a short time this month; keep up the good work and strive to become a competent moderator so that I can be officially recognized in my role as soon as possible!
This post was last edited by *ng*ng916 on 2012-6-30 at 14:15. Username: *ng*ng916. Actual rewards: Wealth + Charm + Prestige – 1200 + 40 + 1. Management tips: Being diligent and responsible are the basic requirements for being a moderator. It’s sad to see that again this month some members were rejected! I hope that the current moderators will do their best to carry out their duties properly and live up to the title of moderator.
Username: A Dai A Mu. Actual bonus awarded: Wealth + Charm + Prestige – 1000 + 30. Management philosophy: I hope everyone can gain something from their participation and from their hard work. The focus is on participation and striving to increase popularity~
This post was last edited by Shuang'er on 2012-6-30 at 14:25. Username: Shuang'er. Actual bonus awarded: 1000+10. Management insights: I like this result, but for those who have over 50 hours of online time, it seems a bit difficult; I’m used to finishing my management tasks and then logging off, before needing to log back in to continue managing.
Username: Zhiyuanliyi. Actual bonus awarded: Wealth + Charm + Prestige = 1000 + 20 + 1. Management insights: Keep learning* and keep making progress
Username: Standing in the East. Actual bonus awarded: 1200 + 40 + 1 + medals. Management insights: I’ve seen that several newly appointed moderators are very diligent and responsible, carrying out their management tasks with great commitment, which has significantly increased the popularity of the industry section. Since working as an overprint assistant for over two months, my role has been to assist with overprint tasks and cooperate with the moderators in various areas; I feel that I haven’t performed very well and there is room for improvement.
Username: Trace Elements. Actual bonus: Wealth + Charm + Prestige: 900 + 300. Management insights: The revolution is not yet successful; more effort is needed in communication! The management of this forum this month has been more or less the same; its popularity is average, with not many people participating in discussions, and there aren’t many meaningful topics to discuss. Everyone still needs to put in more effort!
Username: yizhuxuan Actual bonus awarded: 1000+30 Management insights: There are few managers in some sections, and the moderators are not very proactive in their duties; more effort is needed. The activities need to be further standardized. The standardization of management needs further clarification.