Becoming an Excellent Process Engineer” --2--- “How to Become an Excellent Engineer?” ”

Thread Content

Becoming an Excellent Process Engineer” --2--- “How to Become an Excellent Engineer?” ” The most important factor in becoming an outstanding engineer is “loving one’s profession”. After all, interest is the best teacher; many excellent electronic engineers started out as electronics enthusiasts as children. Hobbies should not only be reflected in actions but also penetrate deep into the heart and even to the very core of one’s being. Many people ask, “How much time should be spent each day on studying and working?” ”It is certain that hard work will yield results, but for engineers and scientists, success does not depend on who spends the most time; rather, it depends on who puts in more \"thought\". Don’t think that a student who sits in their classroom and reads for hours is \"diligent\"; they might even be \"lazier\" than those who stay in their dormitories. In other words, “diligence” refers to the diligence of the brain, rather than physical or superficial diligence. I have been studying electronics for about 15 years now, and I have also encountered many problems. Once, someone asked me how much time I spend working each day. I replied to him, “I spend almost every day thinking, aside from eating and sleeping.” ”It’s no exaggeration to say that many of my engineering ideas were born in my dreams. Inspiration can arise at any time – while brushing teeth in the morning, on the way to work, while eating, or even during quiet moments of conversation with others. Of course, the prerequisite for loving the engineering profession is the ability to appreciate the beauty in engineering and natural sciences. An excellent engineer is also a person who loves science; from the basic principles of science to its spirit, all of these elements permeate his life. Once I saw a teacher from a teaching and research group arrange the order of the defenses. Although this teacher had written many books in the field of mechanical and electrical engineering and made significant contributions in the so-called \"theoretical\" field, judging from his simple way of arranging things like that, he wasn’t particularly strong in theory. Because in my opinion, his working method is extremely inefficient. In other words, there is no spirit of science in his life. An engineer and a scientist are also engineers and scientists in life. Once this issue is raised, what we need to mention is cultivating one’s own thinking qualities. This includes the *habits of thinking, its depth and breadth, as well as the choice of thinking patterns and materials. To become an engineer, there are indeed many innate and decisive qualities; school education and one’s own efforts are merely supplementary measures. Someone once asked me a question about inductive loads; I knew very well that he did not understand the most basic physical concepts involved. First and foremost, the nature of inductance cannot be explained through words or mathematical formulas. Therefore, the foundations of physics and mathematics place high demands on engineers; the physics and mathematics referred to here represent a fundamental understanding, rather than just superficial texts and formulas. I can infer that this person is not very suitable to be an engineer; in fact, the questions he raises are issues that actually exist in everyday life – think about how fluorescent lights turn on, or the moment of discharge when you look at a power plug. But it’s wrong to consider every single moment to be taken for granted. In that case, when Newton saw the apple fall, he would have also found it to be something inevitable