Thread Content
The exhaust gas from low-temperature methanol washing contains alcohol – are there any good solutions?
Low-temperature methanol washing has decades of application experience, resulting in a wealth of technical knowledge. If you haven’t learned this knowledge yourself, you aren’t qualified to ask such questions
It is likely caused by improper operation; under normal operation, there are approximately 50PPM of methanol in the exhaust gases
The total volume of the transformed gas is 800,000 units; the pressure in the low-pressure flash section of the thermal regeneration tower is 0.19 MPa. The amount of nitrogen removed by gas lift is 65,000 units (the design value is 74,000 units). There is a serious problem with alcohol contamination, requiring liquid addition almost on a daily basis. As a current solution, the amount of methanol used for washing in the medium-pressure flash tower is reduced, while the amount of gas discharged from the cycle is increased. Additionally, more methanol is used for the primary washing process and less for the final washing process. Yet, the sulfur level remains high—around 0.1 ppm—even after making these adjustments. The temperature for final washing is -51 degrees Celsius. The flow rates are as follows: 460 t/h for primary washing, 260 t/h for the main washing process, and 270 t/h for sulfur washing. While it’s possible to control the CO2 level, it’s not possible to control the sulfur content in the syngas. The sulfur content at the inlet of the low-methane stream is approximately 0.15–0.2%. The acid gas ammonia emission line keeps having problems; many so-called experts have come, but the issue has still not been resolved
This post was last edited by Bao Tou Xiao Wan Zi on 2018-1-2 at 23:02. I really have no idea how many years you worked with low-temperature methanol washing systems, nor do I know what position you hold or which company you work for. But based on the arrogant statements you make, I guess you’re not that great either – at best, you only have a superficial understanding of the subject. There’s a saying in our company: “Our Lurgi low-temperature methanol washing system is designed to overcome all kinds of challenges.” So what if you have years of experience, or if you’re highly skilled? Whether you come from Shenhua or a design institute, countless so-called experts have failed against our low-temperature methanol washing system. If you’re really that great, feel free to come to Dalun; if you can indeed solve these problems for us, then it won’t be too early to make more arrogant claims
Your company’s devices are amazing, but what does that have to do with you? Did you design them? How much do you know about this set of devices? Where does your sense of pride come from? I say you aren’t qualified to ask such a question because, based on the way you phrased it, it’s clear that you haven’t done any research; you simply throw out a question in hopes that someone else will think for you. Logically speaking, you don’t have the right to do that. Even if I know nothing about low-temperature methanol washing, I can still say you aren’t qualified to ask such a question
800,000 cubic meters per hour of transformed gas? This is a very large device. Many experts were sent to the scene but the problem wasn’t solved. Do you really think that by posting a very naive question, some miracle worker will appear and solve it for you? It’s too fanciful. In terms of technical exchanges, there must be a basic level of respect for such exchanges; one should describe the processes in detail, pinpoint the problems accurately, and transform specific device-related issues into general technical problems so that communication can take place. Looking back at your question, how empty it is. Why don’t you ask how chemical plants can save costs and improve efficiency? That’s a broader question, and the answers to it can be truly imaginative
Where is the device? I’m free to make a trip to the site and take a look if I’m passing by
It gives me the impression that you’re just acting tough. I didn’t say our device was that amazing; I’ll stop talking about it. It’s obvious you don’t understand anyway
"There’s a saying circulating in our company: “Our LUCI low-temperature methanol wash system is designed to take on all those who doubt its effectiveness.” I don’t know who said this; the statement is contradictory, and those who claim to have such capabilities aren’t willing to take responsibility for them. It doesn’t matter if I understand it or not; there are people on forums who do understand it. Your problem is that you can’t understand anything or express yourself clearly; you don’t deserve to ask such questions. You don’t deserve others to waste energy answering you
If you really have the ability and energy, you should focus on finding solutions to problems, rather than wasting time arguing on forums. Your behavior is really poor – look at how people elsewhere speak, instead of acting all arrogant. What’s the point of talking about whether someone has the qualifications or not? On top of that, you even use offensive language, polluting the forum. No matter what a person’s skills are like, if their character is poor, what’s the point of talking about it? I advise you to quit as soon as possible